TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Corpus Christi Independent School District V

CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al. v. CISNEROS Et Al.

Corpus Christi Indep. Sch. Dist. V, 404 U.S. 1211 (1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
August 30, 1971
Docket
No. A-192
Judges
Black
Citations
404 U.S. 1211

Opinion — Black

Mr. Justice Black, Circuit Justice.

The District Judge in this case ordered the Corpus Christi Independent School District to stop alleged historical practices of discrimination against school children on the basis of race or color. He directed how this was to be accomplished, saying at the same time that he would grant no stays of his order. The school district asked the court to stay its order and a stay was granted by a different district judge who had been assigned to hear the application. The plaintiffs, parents of the students allegedly discriminated against, then asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to vacate the stay. A panel of two Circuit Court judges did vacate the stay. The school district then applied to me as a single Justice to reinstate the stay issued by the District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Solicitor General of the United States has joined in requesting me as a single Justice to reinstate that stay. If I reinstate the stay, the District Court’s order will not go into effect until the Fifth Circuit or this Court has had an opportunity to pass on it.

It is apparent that this case is in an undesirable state of confusion and presents questions not heretofore passed on by the full Court, but which should be. Under these circumstances, which present a very anomalous, new, and *1212 confusing situation, I decline as a single Justice to upset the District Court’s stay and, therefore, I reinstate it without expressing any view as to the wisdom or propriety of the Solicitor General’s position. The stay will be reinstated pending action on the merits in the Fifth Circuit or action by the full Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 11977: 11994: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99 (1971) 307

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list