TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vermont v. New York

Vermont v. New York, 406 U.S. 186 (1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 24, 1972
Docket
No. 50 ORIG
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
406 U.S. 18692 S. Ct. 160331 L. Ed. 2d 7851972 U.S. LEXIS 66

Opinion — Per Curiam

406 U.S. 186 (1972)

VERMONT

v.

NEW YORK ET AL.

No. 50, Orig.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 29, 1972. Decided April 24, 1972. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.

Fred I. Parker, Deputy Attorney General of Vermont, argued the cause for plaintiff. With him on the briefs were James M. Jeffords, Attorney General, and John D. Hansen, Assistant Attorney General.

Philip Weinberg, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for defendant State of New York. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Paul S. Shemin and Irving Galt, Assistant Attorneys General. Taggart Whipple argued the cause for defendant International Paper Co. With him on the briefs were Richard E. Nolan and William H. Levit, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The motion by Vermont for leave to file a bill of complaint invoking our original jurisdiction against New York and against International Paper Co., a New York corporation doing business in New York, is granted. New York and International Paper Co. are given until June 19, 1972, to answer the bill of complaint.

So ordered.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1980: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ouellette v. International Paper Co.86 F.R.D. 476 (D. Vt. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Ouellette v. International Paper Co.86 F.R.D. 476 (D. Vt. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list