TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

DILLARD v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA

John R. Dillard, Etc. v. Industrial Commission of Virginia

Dillard v. Indus. Comm'n of Va., 409 U.S. 238 (1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 11, 1972
Docket
No. 72-5411
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
409 U.S. 23893 S. Ct. 56634 L. Ed. 2d 4441972 U.S. LEXIS 3

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Appellant brought a class action to challenge the constitutionality of a state regulation that permitted temporary suspension of his workmen’s compensation payments without a prior hearing. He appealed an adverse judgment, but his jurisdictional statement states that after the decision below “an Order was entered by the Commission approving a lump-sum settlement of $4,243.20 in full settlement of [his] individual claim for compensation for his injury which occurred on March 15, 1971.”

In this state of the record, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to consider whether this case is moot.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 21974: 11977: 119732026peak 1973 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kuahulu v. Employers Insurance Of Wausau557 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1977)
  2. Silas v. Smith361 F. Supp. 1187 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  3. Cottrell v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY363 F. Supp. 692 (E.D. Va. 1973)
  4. Dillard v. Industrial Comm'n of Va.416 U.S. 783 (1974)

Most recent

  1. Kuahulu v. Employers Insurance Of Wausau557 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1977)
  2. Dillard v. Industrial Comm'n of Va.416 U.S. 783 (1974)
  3. Cottrell v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY363 F. Supp. 692 (E.D. Va. 1973)
  4. Silas v. Smith361 F. Supp. 1187 (E.D. Pa. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list