TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stamler v. Willis

Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407 (1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 20, 1969
Docket
No. 478
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
393 U.S. 407

Opinion — Per Curiam

393 U.S. 407 (1969)

STAMLER ET AL.

v.

WILLIS ET AL.

No. 478.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 20, 1969. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 31975: 119702026peak 1970 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mitchell v. Donovan398 U.S. 427 (1970)
  2. MTM, Inc. v. Baxley420 U.S. 799 (1975)
  3. Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.397 U.S. 820 (1970)
  4. Hentoff v. Ichord318 F. Supp. 1175 (D.D.C. 1970)

Most recent

  1. MTM, Inc. v. Baxley420 U.S. 799 (1975)
  2. Hentoff v. Ichord318 F. Supp. 1175 (D.D.C. 1970)
  3. Mitchell v. Donovan398 U.S. 427 (1970)
  4. Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.397 U.S. 820 (1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list