Boyd v. Clark

BOYD Et Al. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Et Al.

Boyd v. Clark, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 13, 1969
Docket: No. 490
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 393 U.S. 31689 S. Ct. 55321 L. Ed. 2d 5111969 U.S. LEXIS 2858

Cited by 83 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, Clark v. Gabriel, ante, p. 256, without reaching the jurisdictional question raised under 28 U. S. C. § 1331 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(affirming 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968) 'without reaching the jurisdictional question raised under 28 U.S.C. 1331')

Fein v. Selective Serv. Sys. Local Bd. No. 7, 430 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1970)
(challenge of constitutionality of student deferment)

Anderson v. Gen. Lewis B. Hershey, Nat'l Dir., Selective Serv. Sys., 410 F.2d 492 (6th Cir. 1969)

Cited by 83 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7430 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1970)
Robert J. Strople v. Local Board No. 60 and Local Board No. 3466 F.2d 601 (3d Cir. 1972)
Murray v. Vaughn300 F. Supp. 688 (D.R.I. 1969)
C. Lynn Van Orden v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense467 F.2d 250 (10th Cir. 1972)
Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States569 F.2d 607 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
National Student Association, Inc. v. Lewis B. Hershey412 F.2d 1103 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

Most recent

Daugherty v. Wallace621 N.E.2d 1374 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993)
In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation611 F. Supp. 1396 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)
Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.611 F. Supp. 1396 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)
Burton v. Exxon Corp.536 F. Supp. 617 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. Simon429 A.2d 609 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1981)
Mid America Bancorporation, Inc. v. Board of Governors523 F. Supp. 568 (D. Minnesota 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list