TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Guana-Sanchez

United States v. Guana-Sanchez, 420 U.S. 513 (1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 3, 1975
Docket
No. 73-820
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
420 U.S. 51395 S. Ct. 134443 L. Ed. 2d 3611975 U.S. LEXIS 706

Opinion — Per Curiam

420 U.S. 513 (1975)

UNITED STATES

v.

GUANA-SANCHEZ.

No. 73-820.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 14, 1975. Decided March 3, 1975. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

Paul L. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, and Gerald P. Norton.

Joseph Beeler, by appointment of the Court, 419 U. S. 961 , argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Donald J. Martin. [*]

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

NOTES

[*] Sanford Jay Rosen and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 21977: 11978: 11979: 119762026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Robert J. Scios590 F.2d 956 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  2. Interest of Rlj336 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
  3. Illinois Migrant Council, Etc. v. Alva L. Pilliod, Etc.540 F.2d 1062 (7th Cir. 1976)
  4. United States v. Thomas J. Brunson549 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1977)
  5. United States v. Jimmy Dorman Coker599 F.2d 950 (10th Cir. 1979)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Jimmy Dorman Coker599 F.2d 950 (10th Cir. 1979)
  2. United States v. Robert J. Scios590 F.2d 956 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  3. United States v. Thomas J. Brunson549 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1977)
  4. Illinois Migrant Council, Etc. v. Alva L. Pilliod, Etc.540 F.2d 1062 (7th Cir. 1976)
  5. Interest of Rlj336 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list