TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA Et Al. (LOUISIANA BOUNDARY CASE)

United States v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 529 (1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 12, 1975
Docket
No. 9 ORIG
Judges
Douglas, Maeshall
Citations
420 U.S. 52995 S. Ct. 118043 L. Ed. 2d 3731975 U.S. LEXIS 42

Opinion

Decree.

Upon consideration of the Report filed July 31, 1974, by Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Special Master, of the exceptions filed thereto by the United States and by the State of Louisiana, and after oral argument thereon, It Is Now Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed as Follows:

1. The exceptions filed by the United States to the Report and recommendations of the Special Master are overruled.

*530 2. The exceptions filed by the State of Louisiana to the Report and recommendations of the Special Master are overruled.

3. The recommendations contained dn the Report of the Special Master are accepted.

4. The parties are directed to prepare and file a decree, for entry by this Court, establishing “a baseline along the entire coast of the State of Louisiana from which the extent of the territorial waters under the jurisdiction of the State of Louisiana pursuant to the Submerged Lands Act can be measured.” Report of the Special Master 53. If the parties cannot agree upon the form of the decree, then they shall refer any remaining disputes to the Special Master for his recommendations. In the event of such a referral, the Special Master is authorized to hold such hearings, take such evidence, and conduct such proceedings as he may deem appropriate and, in due course, to report his recommendations to this Court.

It is so ordered.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Maeshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 21976: 11980: 11982: 11988: 11997: 119752026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Louisiana446 U.S. 253 (1980)
  2. United States v. Alaska521 U.S. 1 (1997)
  3. CHICAGO TCHRS. U., LOCAL NO. 1, AFT/AFL/CIO v. Johnson421 F. Supp. 1261 (N.D. Ill. 1976)
  4. United States v. Louisiana422 U.S. 13 (1975)
  5. Louis v. Nelson544 F. Supp. 973 (S.D. Fla. 1982)
  6. United States v. LOUISIANA485 U.S. 88 (1988)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Alaska521 U.S. 1 (1997)
  2. United States v. LOUISIANA485 U.S. 88 (1988)
  3. Louis v. Nelson544 F. Supp. 973 (S.D. Fla. 1982)
  4. United States v. Louisiana446 U.S. 253 (1980)
  5. CHICAGO TCHRS. U., LOCAL NO. 1, AFT/AFL/CIO v. Johnson421 F. Supp. 1261 (N.D. Ill. 1976)
  6. United States v. Louisiana422 U.S. 13 (1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list