TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Temple v. Temple

Temple v. Temple, 539 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 8, 1989
Docket
No. 88-0981
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
539 So. 2d 5641989 WL 20699

Opinion — Per Curiam

539 So.2d 564 (1989)

John TEMPLE, Appellant,

v.

Marianna TEMPLE, Appellee.

No. 88-0981.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1989.

Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Lewis Kapner, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In 1986, the trial court, in a divorce proceeding, denied an award of attorney's fees and costs to the wife. On appeal, this court reversed the ruling on attorney's fees. Temple v. Temple, 519 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). After remand, the trial court appropriately awarded fees but also granted interest thereon from the date of the initial judgment which had been later reversed on appeal and which contained no attorney's fee award. We again reverse.

Prejudgment interest cannot be assessed since attorney's fees do not constitute liquidated damages. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1985). Interest is only assessable when a claim is for the plaintiff's out-of-pocket, pecuniary loss and there is a fixed date of that loss. The purpose in awarding such interest is to compensate a party for the deprivation of his property. Attorney's fees are not liquidated damages, they are litigation costs. See NCN Electric, Inc. v. Leto, 498 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Grasland v. Taylor Woodrow Homes Limited, 460 So.2d 940 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 471 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1985); First *565 American Bank & Trust v. Windjammer Time Sharing Resort, Inc., 483 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1986).

We would stress that this opinion is directed exclusively to the question of prejudgment interest. We see nothing wrong with the accumulation of interest subsequent to a judgment for attorney's fees. In the instant case, interest would accrue prospectively from the date of the modified judgment (now appealed) awarding said fees. Novack v. Novack, 210 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1968).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1990: 11993: 11994: 11995: 21996: 11999: 119902026peak 1995 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Miller v. Transflorida Bank656 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995) · Concurrence
  2. Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc.670 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1996)
  3. Boulis v. Florida Dept. of Transp.733 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1999)
  4. Ross v. Bandi566 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
  5. Higley South v. Quality Engineered Inst.632 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
  6. Kendall Racquetball Inv. v. GREEN COMP.657 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Boulis v. Florida Dept. of Transp.733 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1999)
  2. Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc.670 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1996)
  3. Miller v. Transflorida Bank656 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995) · Concurrence
  4. Kendall Racquetball Inv. v. GREEN COMP.657 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
  5. Higley South v. Quality Engineered Inst.632 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
  6. Williams v. Williams619 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1985) 398
Novack v. Novack, 210 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1968) 14
Temple v. Temple, 519 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988) 10
Grasland v. Taylor Woodrow Homes Ltd., 460 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984) 9
First Am. Bank v. Windjammer Time Sharing, 483 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) 7
NCN Elec., Inc. v. Leto, 498 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list