Richmond Unified School District v. Berg
Richmond Unified Sch. Dist. v. Berg, 434 U.S. 158 (1977)
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals, 528 P. 2d 1208 , is vacated and the cause remanded for further consideration in light of General Electric Co.
v. Gilbert, 429 U. S. 125 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co.
v. Satty, ante, p. 136, and for consideration of possible mootness.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(aggrieved employee may initiate suit to maintain status quo pending EEOC’s disposition of underlying discrimination charge)
Cited by 36 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1059, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,273 Charla Duke v. Emory Langdon, as Regional Counsel, Western Region, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, United States of America, James Booher, Lamont Olsen, John E. Lahart, Jr.
- Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas
- Karen deLAURIER v. the SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Lester G. Warrenbrock
- McCarthy v. Burkholder
- COMMUNICATION WKRS. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.
- Irizarry v. New York City Housing Authority
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.