TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA v. VILLAGE OF SKOKIE

National Socialist Party of America, Applicant v. Village of Skokie. No. A-162

Nat'l Socialist Party of Am. v. Vill. of Skokie, 434 U.S. 1327 (1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 2, 1977
Docket
No. A-162
Judges
Stevens
Citations
434 U.S. 1327

Opinion — Stevens

Mr. Justice Stevens, Circuit Justice.

Following the entry of this Court’s order of June 14, 1977, 432 U. S. 43 , the Illinois Appellate Court reviewed and substantially modified the injunction entered against applicants by the Circuit Court of Cook County, upholding only that portion of the injunction that prevented applicants from displaying the swastika “in the course of a demonstration, march or parade.” Thereafter, the Illinois Supreme Court scheduled an expedited review of the Appellate Court’s decision, but it denied an application for a stay of the injunction pending that review. On August 18, 1977, a similar application was submitted to me as Circuit Justice. I requested a response from the village of Skokie and have now decided to deny the application.

Applicants have not demonstrated that a stay is necessary to protect this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. There appears to be no danger that the controversy will become moot while the appeal is pending in the Illinois Supreme Court. Nor have applicants demonstrated that the Illinois courts have failed to comply with the “immediate appellate review” requirement of *1328 this Court’s order of June 14, 1977. After the entry of that order, both the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court expedited their consideration of the case, and I am confident that the Illinois Supreme Court will make its decision without any unnecessary delay. Even “immediate” appellate review of an important and difficult issue necessitates appropriate deliberation. Considering these facts, the fact that the injunction has been substantially modified, and the fact that the entry of the stay would be tantamount to a decision on the merits in favor of the applicants, it seems clear that a stay should not be granted.

The application submitted to me as Circuit Justice is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 12000: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bush v. Gore531 U.S. 1046 (2000) · Dissent
  2. Albert Smith, President of the Village of Skokie, Illinois v. Frank Collin439 U.S. 916 (1978)

Most recent

  1. Bush v. Gore531 U.S. 1046 (2000) · Dissent
  2. Albert Smith, President of the Village of Skokie, Illinois v. Frank Collin439 U.S. 916 (1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Socialist Party of Am. v. Vill. of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977) 124

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list