TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Yost v. CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Yost v. Congress Int'l Dev. Corp., 383 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 13, 1980
Docket
No. 79-904
Judges
Hubbart, Nesbitt and Pearson, Daniel
Citations
383 So. 2d 732
Cited by 6 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

383 So.2d 732 (1980)

Roger YOST, Herbert W. Abramson and Ivan Phillips, On Behalf of Themselves, and All Other Shareholders of Congress International Development Corporation, Appellants,

v.

CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Howard Sonn, Stuart E. Wilson, Eugene Snidow and H & M Cattle Company, Appellees.

No. 79-904.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 13, 1980.

Savitt, Kotzen & France and Howard J. Lubel, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Schatzman & Schatzman, Miami, Brooks, Bunin & Gossett, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and PEARSON, DANIEL, JJ.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER TAXING COSTS

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is reversed insofar as it withholds execution on an award of appellate costs relating to a prior appeal in this cause, Yost v. Congress International Corp., 378 So.2d 1300 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), as, in our view, Fla.R.App.P. 9.400(a) clearly entitles the appellant to an immediate award of such costs without stay of execution thereon. In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed. The cause is, accordingly, remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate that portion of the order under review which withholds execution of the award of appellate costs.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1980: 11981: 11983: 11997: 21999: 119802026peak 1997 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stringer v. Katzell695 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
  2. Hillson v. Deeson383 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Polackwich705 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
  4. Lucas v. Barnett Bank of Lee County732 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
  5. Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Dev. Co.432 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  6. Swan v. Wisdom392 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Lucas v. Barnett Bank of Lee County732 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
  2. Stringer v. Katzell695 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Polackwich705 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
  4. Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Dev. Co.432 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  5. Swan v. Wisdom392 So. 2d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  6. Hillson v. Deeson383 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hillson v. Deeson, 383 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) 13
Yost v. Congress Int'l Dev. Corp., 378 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list