TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

MEDIDENT CONSTRUCTION v. Chappell

Medident Constr. v. Chappell, 632 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 15, 1994
Docket
No. 93-1774
Judges
Nesbitt, Cope and Levy
Citations
632 So. 2d 1941994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9521994 WL 45267
Cited by 14 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

632 So.2d 194 (1994)

MEDIDENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant,

v.

Pamela CHAPPELL, Appellee.

No. 93-1774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 15, 1994.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and William R. Clayton and Richard E. Douglas, Miami, for appellant.

*195 Horace E. Hill, Sr., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Medident Construction, Inc. appeals a non-final order denying its motion to compel arbitration and to stay state court action. We reverse.

This dispute arose out of a construction contract entered into between Pamela Chappell, the homeowner, and Medident Construction. The contract contained an arbitration clause providing that all disputes between the parties would be submitted to arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. Chappell filed a complaint against Medident, seeking a declaration of the parties' rights under the contract, compensatory and punitive damages, and fees pursuant to the contract.

The issue on appeal is whether the initial validity of the contract as a whole is to be decided by the trial court or by arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in that contract. Where fraud or some other ground for avoidance or invalidity of contract is alleged as to an entire agreement rather than specifically as to the arbitration clause contained within that agreement, the entire matter should be resolved by arbitration. Manning v. Interfuture Trading, Inc., 578 So.2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Ronbeck Construction Co. v. Savanna Club Corp., 592 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Beaver Coaches v. Revels Nationwide R.V. Sales, Inc., 543 So.2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Only if the attack is specifically and exclusively directed toward the arbitration clause or a separate agreement to arbitrate may the court try the issue before submitting the balance of the dispute to arbitration. Manning, 578 So.2d at 843 . In the instant case, the appellee has not specifically attacked the validity of the arbitration clause itself. Rather, all of the appellee's allegations and contentions go to the contract as a whole. As the court in Ronbeck recognized, the arbitration provision in a contract is separate from the rest of the contract, and must itself be specifically attacked on some appropriate ground. Ronbeck Construction Co., 592 So.2d at 347 ; R.B.F. Management Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Ass'n, Inc., 352 So.2d 561, 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The relief appellee seeks falls within the scope of the arbitration clause and should be submitted to arbitration. We reverse the non-final order under review and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to allow arbitration and stay state court proceedings during the pendency of dispute resolution by arbitration.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1996: 11997: 21999: 22000: 12002: 22003: 12005: 22006: 22008: 119962026peak 1997 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Beazer Homes Corp. v. Bailey940 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  2. Simpson v. Cohen812 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
  3. Great Western Financial Securities Corp. v. Grandison701 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
  4. Sanchez v. Criden899 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
  5. Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. Weston857 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
  6. Kel Homes, LLC v. Burris933 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Most recent

  1. Simply Fit of North America, Inc. v. Poyner579 F. Supp. 2d 371 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)
  2. Beazer Homes Corp. v. Bailey940 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  3. Kel Homes, LLC v. Burris933 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  4. Kaplan v. Kimball Hill Homes Florida, Inc.915 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
  5. Sanchez v. Criden899 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
  6. Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. Weston857 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Ronbeck Const. Co. v. Savanna Club Corp., 592 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992) 68
Manning v. Interfuture Trading, Inc., 578 So. 2d 842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991) 13
Beaver Coaches, Inc. v. Revels NAT. RV Sales, Inc., 543 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989) 22
RBF Mgmt. Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Ass'n, 352 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list