TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Staats v. Bristol Laboratories Div. of Bristol-Myers Co.

Staats v. Bristol Lab'ys Div. of Bristol-Myers Co., 451 U.S. 400 (1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 29, 1981
Docket
No. 80-264
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
451 U.S. 400101 S. Ct. 203768 L. Ed. 2d 1841981 U.S. LEXIS 92

Opinion — Per Curiam

451 U.S. 400 (1981)

STAATS, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.

v.

BRISTOL LABORATORIES DIVISION OF BRISTOL-MYERS CO.

No. 80-264.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 24, 1981. Decided April 29, 1981. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mark I. Levy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Acting Assistant Attorney General Martin, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, Michael Kimmel, Robert Kaplan, and Milton J. Socolar.

Gilbert H. Weil argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Sherman. [*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

NOTES

[*] Philip Lacovara, Ronald A. Stern, Stanley L. Temko, Charles Lister, and Clare Dalton filed a brief for Merck & Co., Inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 11987: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. John Pimentel and Duroyd Manufacturing Co., Inc.810 F.2d 366 (2d Cir. 1987)
  2. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B665 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

Most recent

  1. United States v. John Pimentel and Duroyd Manufacturing Co., Inc.810 F.2d 366 (2d Cir. 1987)
  2. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B665 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list