TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hawkins v. Texas

Samuel Hawkins v. Texas

Hawkins v. Texas, 454 U.S. 919 (1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 30, 1981
Docket
No. 80-6514
Judges
Marshall
Citations
454 U.S. 919

Opinion of the Court

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Motion of American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Dissent — Marshall

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document

454 U.S. 919 102 S.Ct. 422 70 L.Ed.2d 231

Samuel HAWKINS, Petitioner v. TEXAS

No. 80-6514

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1981

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1981.

See 454 U.S. 1093 , 102 S.Ct. 660 .

The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting.

1

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia , 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231 , 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 2973 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1983: 11985: 11987: 11988: 11992: 21993: 11997: 12001: 32006: 219832026peak 2001 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hathorn v. State848 S.W.2d 101 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
  2. Nichols v. State754 S.W.2d 185 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
  3. Ex Parte Carmona185 S.W.3d 492 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
  4. Thomas v. State701 S.W.2d 653 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
  5. Dunn v. State733 S.W.2d 212 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)
  6. Limas v. State941 S.W.2d 198 (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi 1997)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte Carmona185 S.W.3d 492 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
  2. Carmona v. StateNo. AP-75,183 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 1, 2006)
  3. Rodriguez v. State82 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001)
  4. Ernestina Rodriguez v. StateNo. 04-99-00131-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 7, 2001)
  5. Rodriguez v. State82 S.W.3d 21 (Tex. App. 2001)
  6. Limas v. State941 S.W.2d 198 (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) 6,081
Johnson v. Virginia, 454 U.S. 920 (1981) 37
In re Paul, 454 U.S. 1078 (1981) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list