Cory v. Western Oil & Gas Assn.
Opinion
471 U.S. 81 (1985)
CORY ET AL.
v.
WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN. ET AL.
No. 84-16.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 26, 1985 Decided March 27, 1985 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Dennis M. Eagan, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorney General.
Philip K. Verleger argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was John P. Zaimes. [*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] A brief of amici curiae urging reversal was filed for the City of Santa Monica et al. by Robert M. Myers, Karl M. Manheim, Bert Glennon, Jr., and Stanley E. Remelmeyer.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Chance Management, Inc. v. South Dakota
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
- Shell Oil Company, a Delaware Corp. v. City of Santa Monica, a Municipal Corp.
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. City of Palm Springs
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Pacific Maritime Region v. Andrews
Most recent
- Chance Management, Inc. v. South Dakota
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. City of Palm Springs
- Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board Of Education Of The Anchorage School District
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
- Swin Resource Systems, Inc. v. Lycoming County ex rel. Lycoming County Solid Waste Department
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.