TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ramirez v. Indiana

Ramirez v. Indiana, 471 U.S. 147 (1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 13, 1985
Docket
No. 84-5059
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
471 U.S. 147105 S. Ct. 186085 L. Ed. 2d 1131985 U.S. LEXIS 201

Opinion — Per Curiam

471 U.S. 147 (1985)

RAMIREZ

v.

INDIANA No. 84-5059.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 19, 1985 Decided April 1, 1985 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Kenneth F. Ripple, by appointment of the Court, 469 U. S. 1015 , argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David T. Link, Douglas W. Kenyon, Mollie A. Murphy, and Richard S. Myers.

William E. Daily, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General, and Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1987: 11988: 21997: 12017: 12018: 119872026peak 1988 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Newton764 P.2d 1182 (Colo. 1988)
  2. Jacob Maciaszek v. State of Indiana75 N.E.3d 1089 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017)
  3. Starks v. State517 N.E.2d 46 (Ind. 1987)
  4. Espinoza v. State949 S.W.2d 10 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997)
  5. Jacob L. Maciaszek v. State of Indiana113 N.E.3d 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)
  6. Bertucci v. State528 N.E.2d 90 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Jacob L. Maciaszek v. State of Indiana113 N.E.3d 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)
  2. Jacob Maciaszek v. State of Indiana75 N.E.3d 1089 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017)
  3. Espinoza v. State949 S.W.2d 10 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997)
  4. People v. Newton764 P.2d 1182 (Colo. 1988)
  5. Bertucci v. State528 N.E.2d 90 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. Starks v. State517 N.E.2d 46 (Ind. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ramirez v. Indiana, 471 U.S. 147 (1985) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list