Milton v. McCotter, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Charles Milton, Applicant v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections No. A-964
Opinion of the Court
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death scheduled for Tuesday, June 25, 1985, presented to Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant the application for stay and a petition for writ of certiorari and would vacate the death sentence in this case.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
472 U.S. 1033 105 S.Ct. 3516 87 L.Ed.2d 645
Charles MILTON, applicant, v. O.L. McCOTTER, Director, Texas Department of Corrections No. A-964
Supreme Court of the United States
June 25, 1985
The application for stay of execution of the sentence of death scheduled for Tuesday, June 25, 1985, presented to Justice White and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:
1
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 337, 231 , 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 2973 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), we would grant the application for stay, a petition for writ of certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(aggravator satisfied where defendant, by a single and consecutive course of conduct contemplates and causes great risk of harm to more than one person)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.