TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

California v. United States

California v. United States, 490 U.S. 920 (1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 12, 1989
Docket
No. 87-1165
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
490 U.S. 920109 S. Ct. 2273104 L. Ed. 2d 98157 U.S.L.W. 46591989 U.S. LEXIS 2898

Opinion — Per Curiam

490 U.S. 920 (1989)

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 87-1165.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 28, 1988 Decided June 12, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Jerome C. Muys argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Warren J. Abbott, Fred Vendig, Karen L. Tachiki, James F. Roberts, Justin McCarthy, John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General of California, R. H. Connett and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorneys General, and Douglas B. Noble, Deputy Attorney General, Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona, and Anthony B. Ching, Solicitor General.

Edwin S. Kneedler argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Marzulla, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Edward J. Shawaker, and Sarah P. Robinson. Dale T. White argued the cause for the tribal respondents. With him on the brief were William E. Strickland and Scott B. McElroy. [*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

NOTES

[*] Richard Dauphinais filed a brief for the Klamath Tribe et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (holding that the Quiet Title Act displaces APA review of administrative decisions affecting title to land in which the United States claims an interest based on the land’s status as trust or restricted Indian land)

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1992: 11993: 11994: 11995: 11996: 41997: 22000: 42002: 12004: 12010: 12026: 119922026peak 1996 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list