Redwine v. Fitzhugh
Opinion
78 Wyo. 426 (1958) 330 P.2d 112
LAURA REDWINE, Administratrix of the Estate of WILLIAM R. SHELTON, Deceased, and LAURA REDWINE, Individually, Appellant, (Plaintiffs below)
vs.
GORDON FITZHUGH and JAMES FITZHUGH, Appellee, (Defendants below).
No. 2832.
Supreme Court of Wyoming.
October 7, 1958.
Before BLUME, C.J. and HARNSBERGER and PARKER, JJ.
Brief by A.J. Williams.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
OPINION
Mr. Justice HARNSBERGER delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellant asks rehearing on the theory that in examining the decision of the lower court this court had given consideration to the degree of the crop maturation. This premise is completely incorrect, as we expressly refused to speculate upon the degree of the crop maturation and there was no evidence brought to us by the appeal on that subject.
The petition for rehearing must, therefore, be denied.
DENIED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(allowing recovery for value of seed and for labor expended in sowing and cultivating seed where seed destroyed in the ground)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.