Thompson v. Prinslow

Thompson v. Prinslow, 906 P.2d 310 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon · State Appellate Courts
Decided: November 29, 1995
Docket: No. 93C12433 CA A82831
Judges: Riggs, P.J., and Landau and Leeson
Citations: 906 P.2d 310138 Or. App. 1831995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1649

Cited by 4 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

906 P.2d 310 (1995) 138 Or. App. 183

Delwayne THOMPSON, Appellant,

Robert PRINSLOW, Marion County Sheriff, Respondent 93C12433; CA A82831.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 4, 1995. November 29, 1995.

Garrett Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Christopher J. Shine, Multnomah Defenders, Inc.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. In his petition, he alleged that he had received inadequate assistance of counsel at his probation revocation proceeding. [1] The claims petitioner raises on appeal have become moot, because he has completed the 180-day sentence imposed upon revocation. Our review of petitioner's claims will have no practical effect on the rights of the parties involved. Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or. 402, 405 , 848 P.2d 1194 (1993); State v. Chase, 120 Or.App. 523 , 851 P.2d 637 (1993).

Appeal dismissed.

NOTES

[1] On March 22, 1993, petitioner was convicted of menacing, a misdemeanor offense, after entering a guilty plea. The court suspended execution of the 180-day sentence and placed petitioner on probation for 24 months. The court revoked petitioner's probation and imposed the suspended sentence on July 9, 1993, based on petitioner's admissions that he violated his probation conditions.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(post-conviction petition dismissed as moot because petitioner had completed the 180-day sentence imposed)

Cottongim v. Woods, 928 P.2d 361 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts4

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Dick10 P.3d 315 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
Cottongim v. Woods928 P.2d 361 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Rund v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision953 P.2d 766 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
Thompson v. Hall906 P.2d 867 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Most recent

State v. Dick10 P.3d 315 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
Rund v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision953 P.2d 766 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
Cottongim v. Woods928 P.2d 361 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Thompson v. Hall906 P.2d 867 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Brumnett v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd., 848 P.2d 1194 (Or. 1993)	185
	State v. Chase, 851 P.2d 637 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)	4

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list