TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schmidt v. Tracey

Schmidt v. Tracey, 159 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 8, 1964
Docket
No. 32714
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
159 So. 2d 645

Opinion — Per Curiam

159 So.2d 645 (1964)

Gertrude S. SCHMIDT, Petitioner,

v.

Raymond R. TRACEY, Respondent.

No. 32714.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 8, 1964.

Farish & Farish and J.D. Farish, Jr., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Earnest, Pruitt & Schulle and Wallis E. Schulle, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is here on Petition for Writ of Certiorari alleging conflict with Puleo v. Shaw. [1] Although conflict exists we find that inasmuch as the Puleo decision, supra, is reversed by the decision of this Court, [2] the petition herein is denied.

DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and SEBRING (Retired), JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] 149 So.2d 880 (Fla.App.1st 1963).

[2] Shaw v. Puleo, Fla., 159 So.2d 641 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1964) 90
Puleo v. Shaw, 149 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963) 9
Simmonite v. Kittel, 159 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1964) 0

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list