Desarrollos Metropolitanos, Inc. v. Taber Partners I

Desarrollos Metropolitanos, Inc. v. Taber Partners I, 510 U.S. 823 (1993)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 4, 1993
Docket: No. 92-1958
Citations: 510 U.S. 823114 S. Ct. 82126 L. Ed. 2d 5062 U.S.L.W. 32171993 U.S. LEXIS 5070

Cited by 46 2 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

510 U.S. 823

Desarrollos Metropolitanos, Inc. v. Taber Partners I et al.

No. 92-1958.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

Appeal from the C. A. 1st Cir.

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 987 F. 2d 57 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(absent violation of corporate form, focus must be solely on citizenship of entity whose conduct is at issue)

Polanco v. H.B. Fuller Co., 941 F. Supp. 1512 (D. Minnesota 1996)
(court had jurisdiction to review the case, notwithstanding the Eleventh Amendment, because state officer acted ultra vires his authority)

Scham v. Dist. Courts Trying Criminal Cases, 967 F. Supp. 230 (S.D. Tex. 1997)

Cited by 46 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re Bieter Company16 F.3d 929 (8th Cir. 1994)
Edward A. Chappell v. Alan Robbins73 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 1996)
ONE COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. Sprint Nextel Corp.495 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D. Mass. 2007)
Scham v. District Courts Trying Criminal Cases967 F. Supp. 230 (S.D. Tex. 1997)
Fraguada Rodriguez v. Plaza Las Americas349 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D.P.R. 2004)
Murphy v. United States45 F.3d 520 (1st Cir. 1995)

Most recent

Diaz v. Matal268 F. Supp. 3d 267 (D. Mass. 2017)
Hardiman v. United States945 F. Supp. 2d 246 (D. Mass. 2013)
Kennedy v. TOWN OF BILLERICA594 F. Supp. 2d 117 (D. Mass. 2009)
RTM MEDIA, LLC v. City of Houston578 F. Supp. 2d 875 (S.D. Tex. 2008)
Roman Cancel v. United States598 F. Supp. 2d 227 (D.P.R. 2008)
Johansen v. United States506 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list