Reserve National Insurance Co. v. Crowell Et Ux
Reserve Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Crowell Et Ux, 510 U.S. 824 (1993)
Opinion
Reserve National Insurance Co. v. Crowell et ux.
No. 92-1978.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Ala.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 614 So. 2d 1005 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 12 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) of the MDA preempts state strict liability, negligence, and breach of express and implied warranty causes of action against Class III medical device manufacturers because state law actions as well as FDA regulations are requirements under the MDA)
-
(interpreting the term “loss” by “examining the policy as a whole and the interplay between the defined concept of ‘loss’ and various related provisions”)
-
(citing, e.g., Malone v. White Motor Corp., 435 U.S. 497, 98 S.Ct. 1185, 55 L.Ed.2d 443 (1978))
-
(preempting claim that defendant manufacturer fraudulently obtained PMA of device)
-
(when statute is clear, agency interpretation must give way)
-
(no implied right of action)
Cited by 88 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals26
- Federal District Courts36
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts11
- State Appellate Courts14
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Barbara Mitchell and Gregory Mitchell v. Collagen Corporation
- MARTINEZ-CARABALLO v. Intermedics, Inc.
- Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hospital Products Group, Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, Inc
- Charlotte Kennedy and Robert L. Kennedy v. Collagen Corporation
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,061 National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado, as Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Armon Wilson, Deceased v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
- Mears v. Marshall
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.