Stamps v. Collagen Corp

Stamps v. Collagen Corp, 510 U.S. 824 (1993)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 4, 1993
Docket: No. 92-1989
Citations: 510 U.S. 824126 L. Ed. 2d 54

Cited by 83 13 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

510 U.S. 824

Stamps v. Collagen Corp.

No. 92-1989.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 984 F. 2d 1416 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 13 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that existence of express preemption clause precludes reliance on implied preemption doctrine, without determining whether provision constituted a "reliable indicium of congressional intent")

Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., 889 S.W.2d 246 (Tex. 1994)
(holding that the analysis used in Ferebee did not survive the Cipollone decision)

Charles MacDonald Et Ux & State of La., Etc. v. Monsanto Co., 27 F.3d 1021 (5th Cir. 1994)
(finding that the express preemption provision in the MDA precludes any discussion regarding implied preemption)

Estate of LeMay ex rel. LeMay v. Eli Lilly & Co., 881 F. Supp. 428 (E.D. Wis. 1995)
(holding state law claims not preempted where FDA had established no specific requirements unique to the Class III medical device at issue)

28 Ucc rep.serv.2d 531, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,411 Ada M. Martin Harold L. Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Sys., Inc., 70 F.3d 39 (6th Cir. 1995)
(finding that the PMA process constitutes a “specific requirement” applicable to a particular device)

Milkiewicz v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 963 F. Supp. 1150 (M.D. Fla. 1996)
(“[W]e do not believe the [preemption] analysis [in Fere- bee] can be said to have survived Cipol- lone-”)

Sowers v. Johnson & Johnson Med., Inc., 867 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
(claims of failure to warn and defective design preempted where manufacturer of Class III device underwent PMA)

McMurtrie v. Iolab Corp., 914 F. Supp. 1372 (E.D. La. 1995)
(relying on Cipollone for interpretation of state “requirement” under MDA)

Mears v. Marshall, 905 P.2d 1154 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Cited by 83 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Barbara Mitchell and Gregory Mitchell v. Collagen Corporation67 F.3d 1268 (7th Cir. 1995)
In re David L. Smith10 F.3d 723 (10th Cir. 1993)
Myrick v. Freuhauf Corp.13 F.3d 1516 (11th Cir. 1994)
Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.889 S.W.2d 246 (Tex. 1994)
Burgstahler v. AcroMed Corp.670 A.2d 658 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995)
Heiple v. C.R. Motors, Inc.666 A.2d 1066 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995)

Most recent

Betterton v. Evans351 F. Supp. 2d 529 (N.D. Miss. 2004)
Steele v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.295 F. Supp. 2d 439 (D.N.J. 2003)
R.F. v. Abbott Laboratories745 A.2d 1174 (N.J. 2000)
Worthy v. Collagen Corp.967 S.W.2d 360 (Tex. 1998)
Cartegena v. Continental Airlines, Inc.10 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Tex. 1997)
Sam L. Majors Jewelers v. ABX, Inc.117 F.3d 922 (5th Cir. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416 (5th Cir. 1993)	114

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list