Siegel v. Grievance Committee, Ninth Judicial District
Siegel v. Grievance Comm., Ninth Judicial Dist., 510 U.S. 839 (1993)
Opinion
Siegel v. Grievance Committee, Ninth Judicial District.
No. 92-8903.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 182 App. Div. 2d 170, 586 N. Y. S. 2d 822.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[N]o double jeopardy violation occurs when a person is ... convicted of conspiracy and a substantive overt act of the conspiracy.”)
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Davis v. Singletary
- United States v. Gary Wayne Brown
- Eurus Kelly Waters v. Albert G. Thomas, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
- United States v. Olano
- Pedro Medina v. Harry K. Singletary, Florida Department of Corrections
- United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
Most recent
- United States v. Monroe Evans
- United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
- United States v. John E. Gibson
- Provenzano v. Singletary
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7448, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,269 Jose Jesus Ceja v. Terry Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections Donald Wawrzaszek, Superintendent of Arizona State Prison
- Ceja v. Stewart
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.