TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Romano v. Oklahoma

Romano v. Oklahoma, 510 U.S. 943 (1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 1, 1993
Docket
No. 92-9093
Citations
510 U.S. 943114 S. Ct. 380

Opinion

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Does admission of evidence that a capital defendant already has been sentenced to death in another case impermissibly undermine the sentencing jury’s sense of responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 21996: 12002: 119942026peak 1994 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Banks v. State2002 OK CR 9, 43 P.3d 390
  2. Romano v. State1996 OK CR 20, 917 P.2d 12
  3. Mitchell v. State884 P.2d 1186 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994)
  4. Reeves v. Hopkins871 F. Supp. 1182 (D. Neb. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Banks v. State2002 OK CR 9, 43 P.3d 390
  2. Romano v. State1996 OK CR 20, 917 P.2d 12
  3. Reeves v. Hopkins871 F. Supp. 1182 (D. Neb. 1994)
  4. Mitchell v. State884 P.2d 1186 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list