State v. Howley
Opinion
764 P.2d 233 (1988) 94 Or.App. 3
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Bruce Marvin HOWLEY, Appellant.
87-NB-1155; CA A47416.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Petition for Reconsideration September 21, 1988. Decided November 16, 1988.
*234 Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, and Steven V. Humber, Salem, for appellant.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and RIGGS, JJ.
On Appellant's Petition for Reconsideration September 21, 1988.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant's conviction for harassment was reversed by this court for lack of evidence to support the jury's verdict, and the cause remanded for a new trial. State v. Howley, 92 Or. App. 575 , 758 P.2d 893 (1988). On motion for reconsideration, defendant argues that a retrial in this case is prohibited by the former jeopardy provisions of ORS 131.515; Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution; and the Fifth Amendment. The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to a jury verdict or by the order of an appellate court. Or Const, Art I, § 12.
Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; remanded with instructions to dismiss complaint.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(granting “a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to a jury verdict or by the order of an appellate court”)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.