Fore v. Fore
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on February 24, 1948, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583 , 99 P. 2d 498 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.
The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to va *76 cate the judgment entered for the plaintiff below and enter judgment for the defendant below.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.