TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mayo v. State

Mayo v. State, 1952 OK CR 147, 250 P.2d 228
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 12, 1952
Docket
No. A-11713
Judges
Jones, Brett, Powell
Citations
250 P.2d 2281952 OK CR 14796 Okla. Crim. 1431952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 234

Opinion — Jones

JONES, J.

This is an attempted appeal from a conviction sustained in the county court of Beaver county for the misdemeanor of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

■ Judgment and sentence was pronounced against the accused on August 20, 1951. The appeal was not lodged in this court until February 8, 1952, more than five months after the defendant was sentenced.

Title 22 O.S. 1951 § 1054, provides:

“In misdemeanor eases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, However, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.”

In Cruse v. State, 86 Okla. Cr. 83 , 187 P. 2d 235 , it is held:

“While the appeal may be taken by defendant as a matter of right from judgment of conviction, the manner of taking and perfecting such appeal is a proper matter of legislative control, and the statute prescribing the manner in which an appeal can be taken is mandatory.

“A failure to file the appeal in the appellate court within the time allowed by law is fatal to the appeal, and the appellate court has no discretion to hear and determine appeals on the merits when they are not taken within the time prescribed by statute.”

This appeal, not having been filed within 120 days after the rendition of the judgment, the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

The attempted appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court, with directions to enforce its judgment and sentence.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1953: 11956: 11960: 11963: 11964: 31965: 21966: 11994: 119532026peak 1964 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Canady v. Reynolds1994 OK CR 54, 880 P.2d 391
  2. Chase v. State1963 OK CR 12, 378 P.2d 779
  3. Nard v. State1965 OK CR 158, 412 P.2d 489
  4. Scobie v. Page1964 OK CR 113, 397 P.2d 520
  5. Rodrick v. State1966 OK CR 40, 412 P.2d 965
  6. Neal v. State1960 OK CR 78, 355 P.2d 1071

Most recent

  1. Canady v. Reynolds1994 OK CR 54, 880 P.2d 391
  2. Rodrick v. State1966 OK CR 40, 412 P.2d 965
  3. Nard v. State1965 OK CR 158, 412 P.2d 489
  4. Thomas v. Johnson1965 OK CR 22, 399 P.2d 305
  5. Scobie v. Page1964 OK CR 113, 397 P.2d 520
  6. O'Donnell v. State1964 OK CR 95, 397 P.2d 916

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cruse v. State, 1948 OK CR 9, 187 P.2d 235 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list