Regents of the University of California v. Genentech, Inc

Regents of the University of California v. Genentech, Inc.

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Genentech, Inc., 510 U.S. 1140 (1994)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 22, 1994
Docket: No. 93-1014
Judges: O'Connor
Citations: 510 U.S. 1140114 S. Ct. 1126127 L. Ed. 2d 43462 U.S.L.W. 35531994 U.S. LEXIS 1861

Cited by 65 2 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(university was free to grant licenses on an exclusive or nonexclusive basis; decision to withhold license alone did not form the basis of antitrust claim)

Tricom, Inc. v. Elec. Data Sys. Corp., 902 F. Supp. 741 (E.D. Mich. 1995)
(declining to decide the issue)

Forest Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Mercy Ambulance of Richmond, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 296 (E.D. Va. 1997)

Cited by 65 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re Asbestos Litigation90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir. 1996)
In re Fraser75 F. Supp. 2d 572 (E.D. Tex. 1999)
Flanagan v. Ahearn (In re Astestos Litigation)90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir. 1996) · Dissent
Lonza, Inc. v. Rohm and Haas, Inc.951 F. Supp. 46 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board948 F. Supp. 400 (D.N.J. 1996)
Pitts v. Ohio Department of Taxation (In re Pitts)241 B.R. 862 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)

Most recent

Spinelli v. National Football League96 F. Supp. 3d 81 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)
In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative511 F. Supp. 2d 742 (S.D. Tex. 2005)
In Re" Agent Orange" Product Liability Lit.304 F. Supp. 2d 404 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)
Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.304 F. Supp. 2d 404 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)
In re Fraser75 F. Supp. 2d 572 (E.D. Tex. 1999)
Pitts v. Ohio Department of Taxation (In re Pitts)241 B.R. 862 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., & the Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 998 F.2d 931 (Fed. Cir. 1993)	179

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list