Millsaps v. Langsdon
Millsaps v. Langsdon, 510 U.S. 1160 (1994)
Opinion
Millsaps et al. v. Langsdon et al.
No. 93-1090.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 28, 1994.
1
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Tenn. Reported below: 836 F. Supp. 447 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming the district court's ruling that the 1992 house redistricting plan violated the "one person, one vote" doctrine)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Rural West Tennessee African American Affairs Council, Inc. v. Sundquist
- Langsdon v. Darnell
- Rural West Tennessee African American-Affairs Council (98-6718), Phillip R. Langsdon (98-6778) v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee
- State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling Green
- State ex rel. Walker v. Bowling Green
Most recent
- Rural West Tennessee African American-Affairs Council (98-6718), Phillip R. Langsdon (98-6778) v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee
- Rural West Tennessee African American Affairs Council, Inc. v. Sundquist
- Langsdon v. Darnell
- State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling Green
- State ex rel. Walker v. Bowling Green
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.