Morgal Et Ux. v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors
Morgal Et Ux. v. Pinal Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 510 U.S. 1180 (1994)
Opinion
Morgal et ux. v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors et al.
No. 93-7436.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 7, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 993 F. 2d 883 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("[S]elf-serving statements by a defendant that his conviction was constitutionally infirm are insufficient to overcome the presumption of regularity accorded state convictions.")
-
(case analyzing validity of state court conviction used in' sentence enhancement and recognizing that presumption of regularity exists even when no transcript of proceedings is available)
-
(“If, after reference to the language, structure and legislative history of a statute, the intended scope of the statute remains ambiguous, the rule of lenity will apply.”)
Cited by 34 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.