TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Salazar-Guzman v. United States

Salazar-Guzman v. United States, 535 U.S. 946 (2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 2002
Docket
No. 01-8244
Citations
535 U.S. 946122 S. Ct. 1337152 L. Ed. 2d 24170 U.S.L.W. 35782002 U.S. LEXIS 1818
Cited by 22 1 descriptions by later courtsOriginal from court

Opinion

535 U.S. 946

SALAZAR-GUZMAN v. UNITED STATES.

No. 01-8244.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 18, 2002.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 275 F. 3d 1082 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (failure to advise defendant at plea taking that jury must decide drug quantity did not seriously undermine the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the proceeding where defendant agreed he was responsible for sufficient quantities to subject him to enhanced punishment under § 841(b)
    United States v. Shaw, 313 F.3d 219 (4th Cir. 2002)

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
2002: 92003: 12004: 22005: 42006: 22007: 12008: 22009: 120022026peak 2002 · 9

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Pinuelas-Sauceda53 F. App'x 60 (10th Cir. 2002)
  2. United States v. Carpenter119 F. App'x 246 (10th Cir. 2004)
  3. Gibbons v. Lambert358 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D. Utah 2005)
  4. United States v. Clarence J. Lomax293 F.3d 701 (4th Cir. 2002)
  5. United States v. Sparks291 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 2002)
  6. United States v. Stepfon C413 F.3d 760 (8th Cir. 2005)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Basham307 F. App'x 237 (10th Cir. 2009)
  2. United States v. Hartwell572 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (D. Kan. 2008)
  3. United States v. Roberts572 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (D. Kan. 2008)
  4. United States v. Harvey514 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Kan. 2007)
  5. United States v. Hector Salmeron185 F. App'x 550 (8th Cir. 2006)
  6. United States v. Harwell426 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D. Kan. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list