State v. Jenkins
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant
State v. Jenkins, 424 P.2d 894 (Or. 1967)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.
No offer of proof was made and consequently, even *281 if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(supreme court had "no way of determining whether the exclusion" of defendant's evidence was prejudicial, without an offer of proof)
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.