State v. Robinson
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THOMAS LEE ROBINSON, Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken.
See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596 , 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that ineffective assistance claims typically must be raised in a PCR proceeding)
-
(acknowledging that Oregon requires claims for ineffective assistance to be raised in a collateral proceeding)
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.