TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Baez v. Nike Inc.

Baez v. Nike Inc. Et Al.

Baez v. Nike Inc., 535 U.S. 982 (2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 15, 2002
Docket
No. 01-8161
Citations
535 U.S. 982122 S. Ct. 1594

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat *983 ters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992)

(per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4 , and cases cited therein.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Martin v. Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) 710

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list