TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Crawford v. Astrue

Crawford v. Astrue, 567 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2009)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 27, 2009
Docket
Nos. 06-55822, 06-55954, 06-56284
Judges
Kozinski
Citations
567 F.3d 10432009 WL 15197842009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11159

Opinion

567 F.3d 1043 (2009)

Clara CRAWFORD, Plaintiff,

v.

Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee,

Brian C. Shapiro, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant.

Ruby Washington, Plaintiff,

v.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee,

Young Cho, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant.

Daphne M. Trejo, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Respondent-Appellee, Denise Bourgeois Haley, Attorney, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant.

Nos. 06-55822, 06-55954, 06-56284.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 27, 2009.

Brian C. Shapiro, Esquire, Law Offices of Lawrence Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Clara Crawford.

Marcus Kerner, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, Leo Rufino Montenegro, Assistant Regional Counsel, Theophous H. Reagans, Jean Marie Turk, Assistant Regional Counsel, Leo Rufino Montenegro, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Michael J. Astrue.

Lawrence David Rohlfing, Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Brian C. Shapiro, Young Cho and Denise Bourgeois Haley.

Young C. Cho, Santa Fe Springs, CA, pro se.

Denise Bourgeois Haley, Santa Fe Springs, CA, pro se.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list