Simple Technology, Inc. v. Dense-Pac Micro-Systems, Inc

Simple Technology, Inc. v. Dense-Pac Microsystems, Inc.

Simple Tech., Inc. v. Dense-Pac Micro-Sys., Inc., 537 U.S. 802 (2002)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 7, 2002
Docket: No. 01-1787
Citations: 537 U.S. 802123 S. Ct. 69154 L. Ed. 2d 32002 Daily Journal DAR 1169971 U.S.L.W. 32332002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 101852002 U.S. LEXIS 5397

Cited by 30 3 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp.

v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U. S. 722 (2002).

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(vacating and remanding for further consideration in light of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234, 122 S.Ct. 1389, 152 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002))

In re Info. Mgmt. Servs., Inc. Derivative Litig., 81 A.3d 278 (Del. Ch. 2013)
("[A] construction that renders the claimed invention inoperable should be viewed with extreme skepticism." (citation omitted))

Astrazeneca LP v. Apotex, Inc., 633 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.247 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kan. 2003)
ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.633 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Sylvia James v. Hilliard Hampton592 F. App'x 449 (6th Cir. 2015)
Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic Ave, Inc.511 F.3d 1157 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
In re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.322 B.R. 247 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005)
In re the Detention of Thorell72 P.3d 708 (Wash. 2003)

Most recent

Sylvia James v. Hilliard Hampton592 F. App'x 449 (6th Cir. 2015)
Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co.23 F. Supp. 3d 50 (D. Mass. 2014)
In re Information Management Services, Inc. Derivative Litigation81 A.3d 278 (Del. Ch. 2013)
United States v. Johnson871 F. Supp. 2d 539 (W.D. La. 2012)
Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/A657 F.3d 1264 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.633 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002)	608

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list