TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc.

JANET R. IDEKER AND ANOTHER v. LaCRESCENT NURSING CENTER, INC.

Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Ctr., Inc., 207 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 18, 1973
Docket
No. 43844
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
207 N.W.2d 713296 Minn. 2401973 Minn. LEXIS 1187
Syllabus
Unemployment compensation — unemployment benefits — misconduct justifying forfeiture — use of hostile language to patient .

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Writ of certiorari upon the relation of the employer to review a decision of the commissioner of manpower services. The issue is whether claimant should be partially disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that she was discharged for “misconduct” within the meaning of Minn. St. 268.09, subd. 1(1). The commissioner, affirming the appeal tribunal, held that claimant was not subject to any disqualification from receiving benefits. We reverse.

Claimant was employed as a nurse’s aid in a private nursing home. Knowing that the use of harsh or unkind language in dealing with patients could subject her to immediate discharge, she used extremely hostile and harsh language on two separate occasions in expressing her dissatisfaction with a bed-ridden male patient’s failure to control his bodily functions. The commissioner, as did the appeal tribunal, concluded that this did not constitute “misconduct.”

We believe that the facts do not justify that conclusion. The test for determining whether a claimant’s conduct constitutes “misconduct” is whether the conduct evinces a willful or wanton disregard for the employer’s interests or demonstrates a lack of concern by the employee for his job. Tilseth v. Midwest Lbr. Co. 295 Minn. 372 , 204 N. W. 2d 644 (1973). Applying this test, we hold that the commissioner erred in concluding that claimant should not be subject to any disqualification.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 11978: 11979: 11981: 11983: 11984: 51985: 11989: 11992: 119772026peak 1984 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.448 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1989)
  2. Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing343 N.W.2d 683 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
  3. Hulse v. Job Service North Dakota492 N.W.2d 604 (N.D. 1992)
  4. Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller358 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
  5. Budding v. Iowa Department of Job Service337 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983)
  6. Auger v. Gillette Co.303 N.W.2d 255 (Minn. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Hulse v. Job Service North Dakota492 N.W.2d 604 (N.D. 1992)
  2. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.448 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1989)
  3. Gustafson v. IRC Industries374 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)
  4. Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller358 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
  5. Psihos v. R & M Manufacturing352 N.W.2d 849 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
  6. Flannigan v. Meadow Lane Health Care Center347 N.W.2d 852 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 204 N.W.2d 644 (Minn. 1973) 142

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list