Thomas v. Kite

Thomas v. Kite, 424 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided: October 20, 1992
Docket: No. A92A1459
Judges: Johnson, Carley, Pope
Citations: 424 S.E.2d 305206 Ga. App. 8092 Fulton County D. Rep. 24801992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1409

Cited by 6 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Johnson

Johnson, Judge.

Jimmy Thomas sued Nancy Kite for personal injuries he allegedly received when the automobile in which he was a passenger was struck in the rear by the vehicle driven by Kite. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Kite. Thomas appeals, enumerating as error the denial of his motion for directed verdict on the issue of liability, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and certain charges which the trial judge either gave or refused to give.

The evidence showed that after Kite drove through an intersection she glanced at a woman selling flowers on the side of the road. When she looked back up, the traffic in front of her had stopped in order to allow a car to enter or exit the roadway. Kite applied her brakes but was unable to stop before she hit the rear of the car in which Thomas was a passenger.

1. - Thomas contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict. We agree. As in Drake v. Page, 195 Ga. App. 226 ( 393 SE2d 89 ) (1990), it is uncontroverted that Kite admitted that she did not have her eyes on the road immediately before seeing the cars stopped in the road in front of her because she had glanced up at a person selling flowers. No evidence was presented which could ascribe any negligence to the driver of the vehicle in which Thomas was riding, that the accident was unavoidable, or that it was the result of an unforeseen or unexplained cause. See Reed v. Heffernan, 171 Ga. App. 83, 87 ( 318 SE2d 700 ) (1984).

“ ‘The driver of a motor vehicle has no right to assume that the road ahead of him is clear of traffic, and he must maintain a diligent lookout therefor.’ [Cit.]”

Drake, supra at 227 . Kite admitted she looked away from the road and no evidence was presented suggesting that she would not have been able to avoid the collision if she had been looking. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred in denying Thomas’ motion for a directed verdict on the issue of liability and remand the case to the trial court with direction that the issue of damages only be resolved in a new trial.

2. The remaining enumerations of error asserted by Thomas are rendered moot by our holding in Division 1 above.

Judgment reversed.

Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

*81 Decided October 20, 1992 — Reconsideration denied October 30, 1992 L. B. Kent, for appellant.

Page, Scrantom, Harris & Chapman, Richard A. Marchetti, Alvin L. Harris, for appellee.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(court should have granted plaintiff directed verdict where there was no evidence of any negligence by driver of plaintiff’s vehicle nor evidence excusing defendant’s actions, who admitted she took her eyes off the road to glance at a person selling flowers)

Beckett v. Monroe, 548 S.E.2d 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts6

Relies on it most ⓘ

Xiong v. Lankford485 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Dietz v. Becker434 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
Potts v. Roller503 S.E.2d 587 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
Beckett v. Monroe548 S.E.2d 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)
Turner v. Masters698 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)
Murray v. Gardner578 S.E.2d 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)

Most recent

Turner v. Masters698 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)
Murray v. Gardner578 S.E.2d 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)
Beckett v. Monroe548 S.E.2d 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)
Potts v. Roller503 S.E.2d 587 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
Xiong v. Lankford485 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Dietz v. Becker434 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Drake v. Page, 393 S.E.2d 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)	5
	Reed v. Heffernan, 318 S.E.2d 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)	24

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list