TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chapman v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Chapman v. United States Dist. Court for the Western Dist. of Pa., 537 U.S. 1034 (2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 18, 2002
Docket
No. 02-6458
Citations
537 U.S. 1034123 S. Ct. 568154 L. Ed. 2d 45371 U.S.L.W. 33512002 U.S. LEXIS 8561

Opinion

537 U.S. 1034

CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 02-6458.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 18, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 29 Fed. Appx. 100 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (finding the prosecutor’s “do the right thing” comments, made in opening and closing, to be improper; but “not so erroneous” to be fundamen tal error, “as long as they are coupled with references to the evidence in the record”)

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
2002: 12003: 72004: 22005: 22006: 22014: 12017: 220022026peak 2003 · 7

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fitzpatrick v. State900 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2005)
  2. Dorsey v. State868 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2003)
  3. Johnston v. State863 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2003)
  4. Conde v. State860 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 2003)
  5. Reynolds v. State934 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 2006)
  6. Hutchinson v. State882 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2004)

Most recent

  1. Rimmer v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections876 F.3d 1039 (11th Cir. 2017)
  2. Robert Rimmer v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections864 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2017)
  3. Fana v. Secretary, DOC4 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2014)
  4. Reed v. State944 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  5. Reynolds v. State934 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 2006)
  6. Green v. State907 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list