Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISES

HOLLAND LIVESTOCK RANCH, a Copartnership Consisting of BRIGHT-HOLLAND CO., MAREMONTHOLLAND CO., and NEMEROFF-HOLLAND CO., Appellant, v. B & C ENTERPRISES, a Nevada Corporation; WILLIAM BOEGLE; PATRICIA VAN RIPER; FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEVADA; And JERRY D. TORVINEN, Respondents; B & C ENTERPRISES, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. HOLLAND LIVESTOCK RANCH, Et Al., Defendants, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEVADA, Intervenor

Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C Enters., 553 P.2d 950 (Nev. 1976)

Court: Nevada Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided: August 31, 1976
Docket: No. 7857
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 553 P.2d 95092 Nev. 4731976 Nev. LEXIS 639

Cited by 21 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

*474 OPINION Per Curiam:

Here, both sides raise numerous issues on appeal and cross-appeal. After reviewing the record, we conclude the issues presented are either raised for the first time on appeal, supported by no relevant authority, or concern determinations which are based on substantial evidence. For these reasons, and because neither side has affirmatively demonstrated error, the judgment is affirmed. Peot v. Peot, 92 Nev. 388 , 551 P.2d 242 (1976). Charmicor, Inc. v. Bradshaw Finance Co., 92 Nev. 310 , 550 P.2d 413 (1976); Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799 , 544 P.2d 436 (1975); County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263 , 534 P.2d 499 (1975); Kulik v. Albers Incorporated, 91 Nev. 134 , 532 P.2d 603 (1975); Solar, Inc. v. Electric Smith Constr., 88 Nev. 457 , 499 P.2d 649 (1972).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(noting that issues supported by no relevant authority will not be considered)

State ex rel. State Bd. of Equalization v. Bakst, 148 P.3d 717 (Nev. 2006)

Cited by 21 cases

View all citing references →

State Highest Courts21

Relies on it most ⓘ

State, Employment Security Department v. Weber676 P.2d 1318 (Nev. 1984)
City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor Commissioner117 P.3d 182 (Nev. 2005)
Goldman ex rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline830 P.2d 107 (Nev. 1992)
State ex rel. State Board of Equalization v. Bakst148 P.3d 717 (Nev. 2006)
Tahoe Village Realty, S.A.W. Co. v. DeSmit590 P.2d 1158 (Nev. 1979)
Watson v. Watson596 P.2d 507 (Nev. 1979)

Most recent

State ex rel. State Board of Equalization v. Bakst148 P.3d 717 (Nev. 2006)
City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor Commissioner117 P.3d 182 (Nev. 2005)
Goldman ex rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline830 P.2d 107 (Nev. 1992)
Tore, Ltd. v. M.L. Rothschild Management Corp.793 P.2d 1316 (Nev. 1990)
Randall v. Salvation Army686 P.2d 241 (Nev. 1984)
State Industrial Insurance System v. Buckley682 P.2d 1387 (Nev. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Charmicor, Inc. v. Bradshaw Fin. Co., 550 P.2d 413 (Nev. 1976)	14
	Peot v. Peot, 551 P.2d 242 (Nev. 1976)	13
	Alves v. Bumguardner, 544 P.2d 436 (Nev. 1975)	11
	Cnty. of Clark v. Lucas, 534 P.2d 499 (Nev. 1975)	9
	Kulik v. Albers Inc., 532 P.2d 603 (Nev. 1975)	7
	Solar, Inc. v. Elec. Smith Constr. & Equip. Co., 499 P.2d 649 (Nev. 1972)	6

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list