Hardy v. DG MacHinery & Gage Company
HARDY Et Al. v. D. G. MACHINERY & GAGE COMPANY
Opinion
Undercofler, Justice.
The writ of certiorari was granted in this case to review the ruling of the Court of Appeals which *819 held that the motion to dismiss the appeal in that court on the ground that the transcript was not filed within thirty days of the filing of the notice of appeal as required by Code Ann.
§ 6-806 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 26) or within any extension of time obtained under Code Ann.
§ 6-804 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21) was without merit in view of the 1968 addition of Paragraph (d) to Section 13 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073, Sec. 2;
Code Ann.
§ 6-809 (d)).
D. G. Machinery & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 118 Ga. App. 45 (1) ( 162 SE2d 852 ).
Argued November 13, 1968 Decided November 21, 1968 Rehearing denied December 5, 1968.
Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Robert E. Corry, Jr., for appellants.
Fine & Block, Sturgis S. Bates, III, William A. Edwards, Jr., for appellee.
Under the ruling of this court in Fahrig v. Garrett, 224 Ga. 817 , the motion to dismiss the appeal should have been granted.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.