TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roddenberry v. State

Roddenberry v. the State

Roddenberry v. State, 82 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 13, 1954
Docket
No. 35116
Judges
Carlisle, Gardner, Townsend
Citations
82 S.E.2d 4090 Ga. App. 661954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
Cited by 6

Opinion — Carlisle

Carlisle, J.

The assignment of error in the sole special ground of the motion for new trial, that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was abridged by the trial court’s refusal to require the sheriif of the county to divulge the name of the “decoy” who accompanied the revenue officer to the defendant’s home and was supposedly present at the time the defendant sold the whisks' to the revenue agent, is determinative of this case; and upon this point this case is controlled by the decision in Crosby v. State, ante.

Judgment reversed.

Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1957: 11968: 11972: 11975: 21977: 119572026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Taylor v. State220 S.E.2d 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  2. Thornton v. State231 S.E.2d 729 (Ga. 1977)
  3. Smallwood v. State98 S.E.2d 602 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
  4. Wilson v. Hopper218 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. 1975)
  5. Butler v. State194 S.E.2d 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
  6. Williams v. Mayor &C. of Atlanta163 S.E.2d 239 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Thornton v. State231 S.E.2d 729 (Ga. 1977)
  2. Taylor v. State220 S.E.2d 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  3. Wilson v. Hopper218 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. 1975)
  4. Butler v. State194 S.E.2d 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
  5. Williams v. Mayor &C. of Atlanta163 S.E.2d 239 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
  6. Smallwood v. State98 S.E.2d 602 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list