TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cuellar v. United States

Cuellar v. United States, 552 U.S. 973 (2007)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 15, 2007
Docket
No. 06-1456
Citations
552 U.S. 973128 S. Ct. 436
Cited by 13 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

128 S.Ct. 436 (2007)

Humberto Fidel Regalado CUELLAR, petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 06-1456.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 15, 2007.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (court has discretion whether to grant sanctions for a violation of Rule 16; new trial must be ordered based on alleged discovery violation only if such a violation prejudices the defendant’s substantial rights)
    United States v. Hatch, 514 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2008)

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
2008: 62009: 42012: 12013: 220082026peak 2008 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Forest Grove School District v. T.A.523 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2008)
  2. United States v. Garcia587 F.3d 509 (2d Cir. 2009)
  3. M.H. v. New York City Department of Education685 F.3d 217 (2d Cir. 2012)
  4. A.C. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Chappaqua Cent. Sch. Dist.553 F.3d 165 (2d Cir. 2009)
  5. Cuellar v. United States553 U.S. 550 (2008)
  6. United States v. Clarke562 F.3d 1158 (11th Cir. 2009)

Most recent

  1. M.A. v. Torrington Board of Education980 F. Supp. 2d 245 (D. Conn. 2013)
  2. P.G. v. New York City Department of Education959 F. Supp. 2d 499 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
  3. M.H. v. New York City Department of Education685 F.3d 217 (2d Cir. 2012)
  4. United States v. Garcia587 F.3d 509 (2d Cir. 2009)
  5. United States v. Clarke562 F.3d 1158 (11th Cir. 2009)
  6. Ac, Mc v. Bd., Chappaqua Central School Dist.553 F.3d 165 (2d Cir. 2009)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list