Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
Michael v. Caterpillar Fin. Servs., 552 U.S. 1258 (2008)
Opinion
(2008)
SHONTA MICHAEL
v.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES No. 07-902 Supreme Court of United States.
March 17, 2008.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that placement on a brief paid administrative leave and a 90-day performance-improvement plan might dissuade a reasonable employee from making or supporting a charge of discrimination)
-
(holding that the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences based on its own factual findings violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights)
-
(granting certiorari to consider “[wjhether the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Ap-prendi ... and Blakely ... requires that facts (other than prior convictions) necessary to imposing consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant”)
-
(facts supporting imposition of consecutive sentences must be admitted or found by a jury)
-
(denying employer’s motion for summary judgment on FMLA claim)
Cited by 84 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals5
- Federal District Courts15
- Federal Specialty Courts2
- State Highest Courts6
- State Appellate Courts55
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.