Duncan v. General Motors Corp.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

• (noting that state supreme court exercised discretionary power in capital cases to overlook procedural default “in both published opinions and unpublished orders”)

  Bennett v. Mueller, 364 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (C.D. Cal. 2005)

• (collecting cases where the environment. was not sufficiently severe or pervasive, despite the existence of teasing, sexual jokes, inappropriate sexual comments, and repeated instances of unwanted sexual contact)

  Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc., 117 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Or. 2015)

• (holding the same Nevada aggravating circumstance unconstitutionally vague, under Godfrey)

  Rogers v. McDaniel, 801 F. Supp. 2d 1049 (D. Nev. 2011)

• (“[T]he state must provide us with a ‘fair assurance’ that the error was harmless under Brecht.”)

  Belmontes v. Jeanne S. Woodford,, for the Cal. State Prison at San Quentin, 350 F.3d 861 (9th Cir. 2003)

• (improper admission of evidence can amount to a due process violation if it “is clearly prejudicial and ‘rendered the trial fundamentally unfair’ ”)

  Desai v. Booker, 882 F. Supp. 2d 926 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

• U.S. Courts of Appeals17
• Federal District Courts8

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1