Singleton v. State
Singleton v. the State
Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. Citizens & Southern Nat'l Bank v. Bougas, 434 U.S. 35 (1977). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
Webb, Judge.
1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b);
Graves v. State, 135 Ga. App. 921 ( 219 SE2d 633 ).
2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears.
Gerdine v. State, 136 Ga. App. 561, 562 (3) ( 222 SE2d 128 ).
3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.