Food Mart v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
FOOD MART, Petitioner v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, Respondent
Opinion
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Waller, Justice:
This court granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision dismissing petitioner Food Mart’s appeal on justiciability grounds.
Food Mart v. South Carolina Dept. of Health and Environmental Control, 318 S.C. 384 , 458 S.E. (2d) 47 (Ct. App. 1995). We affirm the Court of Appeals insofar as it found petitioner’s claim was moot. However, we vacate the opinion to the extent it addresses whether petitioner was required to exhaust its administrative remedies before bringing the present declaratory judgment action. This issue is procedurally barred from any appellate review because it was neither raised by the parties nor ruled on by the trial court below. Matters now argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review.
Grant v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 319 S.C. 348 , 461 S.E. (2d) 388 (1995);
*234 Vaught v. Waites, 300 S.C. 201 , 387 S.E. (2d) 91 (Ct. App. 1989) (per curiam).
1
Affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Finney, C.J., and Toal, Moore and Burnett, JJ., concur.
1
We decline to address the constitutional issues raised to and ruled on by the trial court. In light of this decision, any discussion of the merits of petitioner’s claim would be purely academic. Furthermore, we granted certiorari specifically only to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding mootness and failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 8 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(standing for the proposition that appellate review of an issue is barred when the issue was not raised or ruled on by the circuit court)
-
(matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review)
-
(Davis Adv. Sh. No. 13 at 8)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.