Dantzler v. City of Hammond, Louisiana
Dantzler v. City of Hammond, 538 U.S. 1042 (2003)
Opinion
DANTZLER v. CITY OF HAMMOND, LOUISIANA, ET AL.
No. 02-9751.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 19, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 414 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(deciding that “the district court must consider the alternative of staying the petition after dismissal of unexhausted claims, in order to permit Petitioner to exhaust those claims and then add them by amendment to his stayed federal petition”)
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Dantzler v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Dantzler v. Hammond Fire & Police Civil Service Board
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney General
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney General
- Castillo v. McDaniel
- Joseph Hunt v. Cheryl Pliler, Warden Csp-Sac Cal Terhune, Director of the CDC California Department of Corrections California State Attorney General
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.